
Understanding by Design (UbD)
Understanding by Design (UbD) Overview
Understanding by Design (UbD) is often called “backward” design because it starts with outcomes, then looks at how to check if these outcomes are met, and lastly considers learning strategies and materials. This model is driven by “big ideas” that should be included in the instruction and how students should be able to use their understanding of these ideas beyond the classroom (LTP Creative Design, LLC., n.d.).
Implications of the Understanding by Design (UbD) Model for Instructional Design
Identify Desired Results (Outcomes)
The first step starts with the end. The Instructional Designer (ID) must carefully consider what learning outcomes are to be reached by students. But it is important to note the mindset here. The idea is to determine what “big ideas” are most worth understanding. These often concern concepts the students can take with them and use beyond the course. There may be a direct takeaway that can be used beyond the course or it may be that the understanding of a takeaway influence things like the way students perceive or gather information from their environment or how they make decisions or see problems. These takeaways are distinct from basic information the students should be familiar with or basic skills the students should have regarding the information in the course. While basic information and skills may be necessary for the course, it is the understanding of these critical takeaways that should drive the next two steps in the UbD process.
Determine Acceptable Evidence
In this second stage, the ID will decide how instructors will measure goal achievement by the students. A student scoring at an appropriate level on an is evidence of the student learning what was laid out in the learning objectives. An assortment of different types of assessments should be used. However, particular focus should fall on assessments that seem like they capture elements of how their learning can be applied in the real world.
Plan Learning Experiences (Activities)
The learning goals and assessments from the first two stages should drive what learning activities and materials are created and chosen. While learning goal attainment should be at the forefront of the learning plan there are some other considerations as well. For instance diversity of learner preferences should be taken into consideration. As such, a variety of activities and materials should be included. It is also pointed out that these various activities should be engaging. Similarly, incorporating reflection and real-world connections into the activities can be very beneficial for the students (especially in meeting these goals that require the student to reach beyond the course.) Additionally, the assessments that were previously designed could be embedded into the materials and activities.
Instructional Designers (IDs) using Understanding by Design will need to carefully consider what is most important for learners to know. Close work with subject matter experts will be necessary to recognize all that could be known and find that subset of key takeaways.
It is important for IDs to realize that according to UbD, instructors are meant to act like coaches, and not just disseminate facts (ASCD, 2015). Emphasizing this approach can be key. Often times instructors are experts, and they may want to give students as much information as can be packed in. Instructional designers use UbD to focus the course on the “enduring understandings” which should give instructors the context to perform more like coaches.
In that same realm, instructional designers should create assessments that go beyond basics facts. They don’t just assess the recall of textbook information (Harker Brownlow Education, 2013).
One final implication that I’ll mention here is that IDs using UbD should recognize that that should facilitate or conduct regular reviews.
Strengths and Limitations of Understanding by Design (UbD) in Higher Education (Opinion)
I believe that there are several potential benefits to using this model in Higher Education. The biggest strength is one that transcends the context: the primacy of learning objectives. I think having these objectives that focus on transferable concepts driving the entire design process will lead to superior learning experiences for students.
Another strength is the focus on not using textbooks to drive design. I think that the use of textbooks to drive design in higher education is prevalent. Now, this may not be an entirely problematic thing, if it is a well laid out text with quality objectives, but I think most of the time deeper consideration and customization should be put in. UbD encourages this.
An additional strength for higher education the manner in which change is portrayed. The emphasis is on striving to make things the best you can, but not expecting perfection. Similarly, discussion around the model suggests that you might take one part of a course and use UbD on it as a start rather than making wholesale changes to the entire course. This could be very beneficial in that there may not be the time or the resources to completely redesign an entire course between iterations.
Perhaps the biggest downside in higher education this model is similar to many other models in that it is resource intensive. Resources can be difficult to secure in academia if it is for something outside the status quo.
Another big limitation is that “authentic” assessments may be more challenging in higher education than it might be in a corporate setting where students could try out their new knowledge on the job.
A final potential limitation in higher education that I will mention here is that sometimes learning objectives (and particularly course objectives) are specified at a higher level – from outside the course. As such, some learning goals, may not really fit the ideas for this model.
ASCD. (September 29, 2015). 7 Key Tenets of Understanding by Design® Framework Infographic. Retrieved from https://elearninginfographics.com/7-key-tenets-understanding-design-framework-infographic/
Bowen, R. S. (2017). Understanding by Design. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved April 30, 2024 from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/understanding-by-design/.
​
Harker Brownlow Education. (July 17, 2013). What is Understanding by Design? Author Jay McTighe explains [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8F1SnWaIfE
​
LTP Creative Design, LLC., (n.d.) UBD Stage #1:Defining Goals. Retrieved on 5/1/2024 from UBD Stage #1: Defining Goals - LTP Creative Design, LLC (ltpcreativedesignllc.com)